Friday, September 25, 2009

Ollie versus Lone Gull

I love messing around with numbers and today I decided to work on the difference between the two New England championships. The races were only 8 days apart so no one really had time to get out of shape (or into shape) in that small window.

My goal for the 10k was to run a faster pace per mile than the 5m of a week ago. My logic was that I'd have an extra week of training and that first hard effort under my belt (after the 6 week lay-off). I exceeded my goal and it got me wondering how many people ran a faster pace per mile from the Ollie to the Lone Gull. I used the top 200 finishers (because I didn't feel like plowing through almost 800 finishers from each race). There were 95 runners who finished in the top 200 in both races. I then divided there time from Ollie by their time for Lone Gull and came up with a percentage. The difference between Ollie (4.91 miles) and Lone Gull (6.22 miles) yields 126.68%. So anyone under that actually ran a faster pace per mile at the 10km than at Ollie (despite running 1.32 miles more). I was surprised to find that of the 95 who finished in the top 200 in both races 48 (almost exactly half) ran faster! I find that very surprising. I'd expect some slow down for most. Some could have been affected by the weather at Ollie or perhaps "dogged it" at Ollie knowing they'd be doing a 10km a week later. Somehow I doubt that, we are talking about some of the top runners in NE and some of the top age group runners as well. Maybe the Lone Gull course is faster? The topo shows that Ollie had a total climb of 120' and Lone Gull had 231', so that doesn't seem right.

Anyway, I'm happy that I had a better run at LG than Ollie.

Percent
Name
10km
5mile
Cat
120.36%
JustinVerdirame
0:38:08
0:31:41
M2039
121.01%
AndyMacDonald
0:35:54
0:29:40
M4049
121.10%
DonaldChapelle
0:37:41
0:31:07
M5059
121.31%
JoshuaGordon
0:32:27
0:26:45
M2039
121.90%
RandyMacNeill
0:35:32
0:29:09
M4049
122.29%
MartyLechleider
0:37:51
0:30:57
M5059
123.08%
PhilRiley
0:39:22
0:31:59
M5059
123.35%
EphraimEzekiel
0:36:43
0:29:46
M5059
123.37%
DaveDunham
0:35:17
0:28:36
M4049
123.39%
DavidConsigli
0:38:20
0:31:04
M4049
123.60%
MichaelMcHugh
0:37:16
0:30:09
M5059
123.95%
TitusMutinda
0:31:55
0:25:45
M4049
124.05%
MichaelQuintal
0:36:37
0:29:31
M2039
124.36%
ReneeKnapp
0:37:06
0:29:50
F2039
124.44%
BobDabrieo
0:34:53
0:28:02
M4049
124.54%
DanVerrington
0:33:45
0:27:06
M4049
124.68%
AndyMcCarron
0:32:10
0:25:48
M2039
124.85%
DanVassallo
0:30:39
0:24:33
M2039
124.92%
MichaelLescarbeau
0:38:46
0:31:02
M3039
124.94%
MikeCooney
0:33:24
0:26:44
M4049
124.96%
JohnBarbour
0:35:18
0:28:15
M5059
125.00%
PaulCorcoran
0:40:20
0:32:16
M5059
125.12%
BarbaraMcManus
0:37:51
0:30:15
F4049
125.16%
RenoStirrat
0:35:14
0:28:09
M5059
125.28%
JaredMarkowitz
0:32:08
0:25:39
M2039
125.32%
NancyCorsaro
0:40:35
0:32:23
F5059
125.45%
ChrisSpinney
0:37:18
0:29:44
M4049
125.49%
WillDobbie
0:30:41
0:24:27
M2039
125.50%
SteveSeide
0:39:37
0:31:34
M5059
125.53%
JillTrotter
0:40:29
0:32:15
F2039
125.55%
AlanBernier
0:32:36
0:25:58
M2039
125.59%
DavidBedoya
0:31:59
0:25:28
M2039
125.78%
MattRidout
0:37:24
0:29:44
M2039
125.86%
GordonMacfarland
0:37:19
0:29:39
M6069
125.91%
RyanAschbrenner
0:32:53
0:26:07
M2039
125.91%
JimPawlicki
0:34:30
0:27:24
M2039
125.92%
DavidQuintal
0:35:13
0:27:58
M4049
126.02%
DennisDonoghue
0:38:40
0:30:41
M5059
126.12%
MattClark
0:32:55
0:26:06
M2039
126.16%
StephenPeckiconis
0:40:55
0:32:26
M5059
126.30%
CurtisWheeler
0:30:44
0:24:20
M2039
126.30%
NicholasWheeler
0:30:44
0:24:20
M2039
126.33%
JonathanFortescue
0:32:33
0:25:46
M4049
126.42%
ToddCallaghan
0:34:32
0:27:19
M4049
126.43%
BrettEly
0:35:29
0:28:04
F2039
126.58%
JonWaldron
0:35:57
0:28:24
M5059
126.60%
DanPrincic
0:31:53
0:25:11
M2039
126.69%
KenRoss
0:40:16
0:31:47
M4049
126.70%
JeffreySilveira
0:37:10
0:29:20
M4049
126.76%
SteveReed
0:39:14
0:30:57
M6069
126.79%
PatArd
0:32:11
0:25:23
M2039
126.88%
JenHealey
0:32:39
0:25:44
M2029
126.90%
ErrolYudelman
0:37:35
0:29:37
M5059
126.94%
NateKrah
0:31:06
0:24:30
M2039
127.01%
JosephKoech
0:30:20
0:23:53
M4049
127.04%
ScottAnderson
0:33:31
0:26:23
M4049
127.04%
AndyChandonnet
0:38:27
0:30:16
M5059
127.10%
GretchenChick
0:37:31
0:29:31
F2039
127.14%
BenSchmeckpeper
0:31:56
0:25:07
M2039
127.33%
MarkReeder
0:35:43
0:28:03
M4049
127.45%
PaulDoe
0:36:22
0:28:32
M5059
127.51%
CraigFram
0:33:55
0:26:36
M5059
127.59%
JustinFreeman
0:31:36
0:24:46
M2039
127.65%
MaxWhite
0:36:42
0:28:45
M2039
127.68%
KarenPattelena
0:41:08
0:32:13
F4049
127.78%
RichSmith
0:34:30
0:27:00
M2039
128.08%
MikePlatt
0:33:18
0:26:00
M4049
128.13%
SarahTorkelson
0:40:55
0:31:56
F2039
128.20%
DavidOliver
0:36:36
0:28:33
M5059
128.31%
JustinFyffe
0:30:40
0:23:54
M2039
128.32%
PaulRyan
0:31:07
0:24:15
M2039
128.32%
KevinTilton
0:32:33
0:25:22
M2039
128.34%
JoeNavas
0:32:18
0:25:10
M2039
128.36%
RobertCipriano
0:36:08
0:28:09
M4049
128.42%
TerryMcNatt
0:34:43
0:27:02
M4049
128.43%
RichStockdale
0:40:53
0:31:50
M5059
128.43%
MatthewEly
0:31:19
0:24:23
M2039
128.62%
CarlosRivera
0:33:56
0:26:23
M2039
128.65%
CathyMerra
0:38:46
0:30:08
F5059
128.73%
DanSmith
0:31:22
0:24:22
M2039
128.98%
DaveDechellis
0:34:25
0:26:41
M2039
129.12%
JohnWebber
0:40:08
0:31:05
M5059
129.14%
KathyLynch
0:40:15
0:31:10
F4049
129.15%
DavidKelly
0:39:04
0:30:15
M5059
129.54%
RichardClark
0:41:57
0:32:23
M5059
129.64%
MeghanLynch
0:38:25
0:29:38
F2029
129.74%
BobStrout
0:39:33
0:30:29
M5059
129.74%
AllisonTables
0:41:22
0:31:53
F2039
130.58%
JimJohnson
0:33:14
0:25:27
M3039
131.10%
TomOffenbacher
0:37:27
0:28:34
M5059
131.29%
AmeliaBishop
0:38:32
0:29:21
F2029
131.39%
JoseOrtiz
0:35:01
0:26:39
M2029
133.16%
TomCasey
0:34:16
0:25:44
M2029
135.98%
MimiFallon
0:40:49
0:30:01
F4049
136.16%
SethWilliams
0:37:13
0:27:20
M3039

1 comment:

mueblerunner said...

Very interesting number crunching. I guess I owe you and MQ a coffee for kicking my butt in this category!